Sexy Bollywood Videos - Law & Rules videos, Page: 1 of 308 http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/Law & Rules/page1.html en Copyright Sexy Bollywood Videos Nov-20-2008 http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/Ya7UyUqkYtU/IRB-Guide-to-Experimental-Law-Variations.html IRB Guide to Experimental Law Variations IRB Guide to Experimental Law Variations



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=Ya7UyUqkYtU http://img.youtube.com/vi/Ya7UyUqkYtU/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/uYbaMWxVoGA/RULE-OF-LAW-Justice-in-Kosovo-clip.html RULE OF LAW - Justice in Kosovo (clip) Documentary by Susanne BrandstätterProduktion: Aichholzer Film in coproduction with Envision FilmCan our concepts of justice and democracy simply be applied to other countries?Looking for something more adventurous than her life as a judge in Vienna, Claudia Fenz applies for a post at the UN. The organisation takes her on, and sends her to Prizren, a town in southern Kosovo, as part of the UNMIK mission for the democratic reconstruction of this Balkan region devastated by the 1999 war. Following the riots in March 2004, the Austrian judge takes on the trial of six Albanians accused of having stoned a Serb and his mother to death. The documentary Rule of Law: Justiz im Kosovo charts Claudia Fenz's attempts to work with the local council. The judge has to deal with the moral standards and traditional rules of this patriarchal society which are contrary to the «rule of law», decreed by the international organisation. Tirelessly seeking to familiarise herself with the local customs, Claudia Fenz attests to the tensions between the two ethnicities, whilst asking questions of the very meaning of justice itself.



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=uYbaMWxVoGA http://img.youtube.com/vi/uYbaMWxVoGA/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/D4XQhVCm1SI/Murphy-s-Law-NYE-1989-Intro-California-pipeline-and-America-rules.html Murphy's Law NYE 1989 Intro, California pipeline and America rules Murphy's Law New Years 1989 I'm a Proud Republican I'm A Proud American...The New McCain Theme Song? Ronald Reagan He's My Man If he can't do it nobody can..cept for GB Senior. America Rules!!!NOT ONE PERSON IN THIS CROWD HAS A CEL PHONE THEY DIDN'T EXIST BACK IN 1989 IN THE PUBLIC...Back then cel phones did not exist in the masses...there were no dvds...they didn't exist. I lived through the birth of Rap, Hip Hop, Punk and Hardcore, Techno, Electonica. GOA, etc.... Oh what will come next?LIVE SOLD OUT.It seems like it was yesterday and it was 21 years ago. The Cold War was almost over and people feared Nuclear Weapons on a daily basis Ronald Reagan was President n Chief.Most people were spending there time with Kenny Loggins and Footloose and nose rings or even wearing your baseball cap on backwards was sure to get you noticed especially in Greenwich Connecticut...barely anyone wore different clothes or showed off piercings like nose rings...like they do now, no one did the things they do now...It will never be the way it was... in the beginning. but we will stand strong...Kids... you can't stage dive like this now a days... you can't even congregate like this. ..please seek a peaceful freedom for tibet...and Jolt Cola was it. John McCain For President or Clinton or Obama or none of the above...http://www.johnmccain.com/landing/a2.htm?s=google&t=creative1aPresident Jogn McCainJohn McCain for PresidentPresident Jogn McCainJohn McCain for PresidentPresident Jogn McCainJohn McCain for PresidentPresident Jogn McCainJohn McCain for President



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=D4XQhVCm1SI http://img.youtube.com/vi/D4XQhVCm1SI/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/9KuNm-JDhBw/Law-and-Order-Rules-Pockets-of-Sanity-Podcast-004.html Law and Order Rules - Pockets of Sanity Podcast #004 Leave a voicemail for the show!1-206-339-6063This week's episode is a hodgepodge of potpourri and other assorted randomness as your faithful host clears out more of your phone messages and voicemails.



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=9KuNm-JDhBw http://img.youtube.com/vi/9KuNm-JDhBw/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/HQc1J8dpb74/People-Power-Rule-of-Law-05-June-08.html People & Power -Rule of Law - 05 June 08 Film maker Oliver Steeds journeys along the Yangtze to investigate a change in the power balance between the common people and the iron fisted authorities.



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=HQc1J8dpb74 http://img.youtube.com/vi/HQc1J8dpb74/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/k9vsltG2fkI/How-Many-Lessons-Do-We-Need-About-Bush-Admin-Rule-of-Law.html How Many Lessons Do We Need About Bush Admin & Rule of Law? http://cspanjunkie.org/June 24, 2008 C-SPAN



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=k9vsltG2fkI http://img.youtube.com/vi/k9vsltG2fkI/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/rIKbYjFupBA/Hemp-and-the-Rule-of-Law.html Hemp and the Rule of Law Excerpt from the 55 minute documentary, "Hemp and the Rule of Law" chronicles the movement to legalize the growing of hemp for American farmers. Hemp is the non-narcotic relative of marijuana, once grown on American farms. Today, it is under the control of the Drug Enforcement Administration, who call it marijuana. The U.S. is the only industrialized nation to outlaw the crop.



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=rIKbYjFupBA http://img.youtube.com/vi/rIKbYjFupBA/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/_isYYhq1AB8/TOP-STORY-USA-under-Martial-Law-RED-ALLERT-OCTOBER-1ST-2008.html TOP STORY: USA under Martial Law !!! RED ALLERT! OCTOBER 1ST 2008 Martial Law Declared In CongressThe House Republican Leadership has announced its intention to have the House vote, before adjourning on Friday or Saturday, on several major pieces of legislation that are not yet available to House members in final form because behind-closed-door negotiations on the proposals are still going on. The Leadership apparently intends to use a process known as martial law to allow these bills to be brought to the floor very shortly after negotiations are completed, with the result that Members of the House are likely to have virtually no time to examine and consider the details of the legislation before they will be required to vote on it. Now once again its happening over the 700 billion $ bailout.http://polidics.com/martial-law/martial-law-declared-in-congress.htmlMartial Law declared today:Today a Congressional Martial Law was declared in order to push the Senate bill for the $700 Billion dollar bailout through Congress, announced by Texas Representative Michael Burgess on C-Span. Tomorrow, Congress will have to vote yes or no on a bill that they will not be able to review or discuss. This bill could very well contain hundreds of pages of "small print" that they would have no idea of what they were voting on. The government could easily place certain provisions in there that could affect each mortgage holder affected by this bailout. After tomorrow, the government will own many of our homes.http://www.topix.com/forum/city/blytheville-ar/T1H8MFTHKJCA0JH74Representatives Were Threatened with "Martial Law" if Bailout Bill Did Not PassCongressman Brad Sherman of California's 27th congressional district told the House in a speech on Thurs evening that several fellow Congressional representatives have said they were threatened with the prospect 'Martial Law' should they vote in opposition to the $700 billion bailout.Congressman Sherman's revelation comes after multiple claims that this threat was being ramped up to aid the now $850 billion bail out through the House this past Friday.CA Congressman Brad ShermanAccording to numerous Congressional testimonies, the stark panic atmosphere which has gripped both Congress and the US media was intentionally created in order to 'fast-track' a financial bailout bill. Several members of Congress were told before Monday's vote that martial law might be instigated in America if the legislation failed.During his speaking time on Thurs, Congressman Sherman stated explicitly, "Many of us were told in private conversations, that if we didn't pass this bill on Monday, the sky would fall, the market would drop two or three thousand points, another couple thousand the second day, and a few members were even told that there would be Martial Law in America if we voted no(to the bail out bill)."Earlier this week, Congressman Michael C. Burgess from the 26th District of Texas, went public on Monday stating live on Infowars nationwide radio broadcast, that House speaker Nancy Pelosi had declared House Rule 136A, effectively putting the House under "Martial Law" rules, a dictatorial measure only activated during times of national emergency. Analysts and Congressmen alike have equated these threats to "fearmongering" and described as a form of "economic terrorism" carried out by powerful banking interests in order to secure the record $850 billion payout to the banks by the American people.Physical Martial law may be invoked by the President of the United States in case of any deemed "state of emergency". Martial Law has not been put into practice since Lincoln, where several Congressmen were arrested or put under house arrest. In 1878, Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids military involvement in domestic law enforcement without congressional approval. However, both the Military Commissions Act of 2006 and USNORTHCOM has increased its direct involvement with US civilian administration. Additionally, the John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007, and President Bush's recent PD51 may possibly rescind previous limits by suspending Government as well as other Constitutional guarantees such as habeas corpus.Viewers can watch his actual testimony from the House floor here:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnbNm6hoBXcWatch Rep. Shermans full speech at CSPAN.To read more commentary by this author on the Federal Reserve System, go to:http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/The-Banker-s-Trick-Americ-by-Patrick-Henningsen-081003-514.html



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=_isYYhq1AB8 http://img.youtube.com/vi/_isYYhq1AB8/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/p6KRXnYgu5I/Congressman-Brad-Sherman-Martial-Law-if-We-Voted-No-1.html Congressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [1] October 2, 2008, U.S. House of Representatives. Congressman Brad Sherman [D-CA] asks: "But why are we bailing out the Bank of China? Why are we bailing out the Saudi royal family?... The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and by sustaining a panic atmosphere... A few Members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted ``no.''________________________________________Congressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu5ICongressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55lOhYw8LxkCongressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHFUa4SpPBUSherman's speech on the 1st proposal (or 2nd if you count the proposal published on Sept 20th) of the Bailout bill (September 29th 2008): Best on Bailout Dayhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXGv6qSwuPsAlex Jones interviews Brad Shermanhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egXhZMaY26wSherman's Blue Paper on the Bailouthttp://bradsherman.house.gov/081001comprehensive_article.pdf171 Heroes vs 263 Traitorshttp://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-681Paul Craig Roberts: It takes the trouble off the banks and puts it on the taxpayershttp://youtube.com/watch?v=PLbWau3rsag&NR=1________________________________________CONFUSION WITH CONGRESSIONAL MARTIAL LAWHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared -congressional martial law- on Sept 27, 2008. Which is a procedural blanket that removes the rule requiring at least one day between the time a Bill is introduced in the House and the day a vote is taken.Listen to congressman Michael Burgess [R-TX] addressing congressional martial law on Sept 28: "I understand we're under martial law as declared by the Speaker last night."http://youtube.com/watch?v=l7B4laX1E70Read the BLANKET MARTIAL LAW RULE THROUGH MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 29THhttp://rules-republicans.house.gov/ShortTopics/Read.aspx?id=220That IS NOT the Martial Law that Brad sherman was referring to.Brad Sherman was specifically referring to Martial Law IN AMERICA, IN THE NEAR FUTURE, not the Sept 27-29 procedural blanket.Sherman would later confirm the nature of the threat (a National Emergency) on the Alex Jones show.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egXhZMaY26w________________________________________TRANSCRIPTI thank the Chair. I have got 30 minutes, and I will share some with the gentlelady from Ohio in just a second to describe the flaws with this bill. Believe it or not, 30 minutes is not long enough. But first I want to mention about the calls that are coming into our office. The calls used to be from people around the country. Now Wall Street firms have their employees unplugging those headsets to call investors and instead calling Members of Congress. So now the calls coming in to at least my office have shifted from 20-1 against this bailout package for Wall Street, down to about 3-1 or 4-1 against this bailout. I ask my colleagues not to be confused. Edit out some of those calls that are coming to you from folks who are being paid to make the call, and you will realize the country remains absolutely overwhelmingly opposed to this Wall Street bailout bill. I thank again the gentleman from Ohio, and I will make a few more points. We had a meeting of the Skeptics Caucus, which is now a bipartisan Skeptics Caucus, where we heard from Bill Isaac. Mr. Isaac was Chair of the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation), having first been appointed to that board by President Carter and then appointed by Reagan. You don't find very many people who have support on both sides of the aisle like that. (...)[ http://www.c-spanarchives.org/congress/?q=node/77531&id=8902074 ]The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and by sustaining a panic atmosphere. That atmosphere is not justified. Many of us were told in private conversations, if we voted against this bill, that, on Monday, the sky would fall and that the market would drop 2,000 or 3,000 points the first day and another 2,000 the second day. A few Members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted ``no.'' [ http://www.c-spanarchives.org/congress/?q=node/77531&id=8902076 ]



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=p6KRXnYgu5I http://img.youtube.com/vi/p6KRXnYgu5I/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/BrlQNz31n34/congressional-martial-law-what-s-in-the-bailout-anyway.html congressional martial law.. what's in the bailout anyway??? http://cspanjunkie.org/September 28, 2008 C-SPANUPDATE:H. Res.___ -- Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to the consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on RulesSeptember 27, 2008H.Res.___ Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules Managers: Slaughter / Dreier BLANKET MARTIAL LAW RULE THROUGH MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 29THMotion offered by: Summary of Motion Vote Tally Dreier To specify that the provisions of the rule only apply to a bill addressing the current financial crisis or a bill relating to the extension of tax credits.Defeated 4 to 9 Dreier To provide that the House shall not consider any rule on the same day it is reported from the Rules Committee, pursuant to this resolution, unless the Majority Leader has given at least 6 hours notice.Defeated 4 to 9 Dreier To provide that the provisions of the rule only apply to resolutions reported unanimously from the Rules Committee.Defeated 4 to 9 McGovern To report the martial law rule waiving a requirement of Clause 6(a) of Rule XIII with respect to consideration of any resolution reported from the Rules Committee, through the legislative day of September 29, 2008. It does not apply to any specific measure, but rather grants blanket authority.Agreed to by voice vote Watch this CSPAN clip. Rep.Burgess confirms the speaker declared martial law last night!



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=BrlQNz31n34 http://img.youtube.com/vi/BrlQNz31n34/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/4rApwnQ9sQ0/Chris-Dodd-Speaks-on-the-Rule-of-Law-in-Iowa-City-11-6-07.html Chris Dodd Speaks on the Rule of Law in Iowa City, 11/6/07 Chris Dodd discusses "The Rule of Law in U.S. National Security and Foreign Policy" at an event hosted by the Iowa City Foreign Relations Council.



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=4rApwnQ9sQ0 http://img.youtube.com/vi/4rApwnQ9sQ0/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/V4v7SWY3MCc/Jane-Fonda-On-Georgia-Rule-CBS-News.html Jane Fonda On 'Georgia Rule' (CBS News) Jane Fonda was out of movies for 15 years before she reappeared in "Monster-In-Law" in 2005. Now the two-time Oscar-winner is back. She chats with Hannah Storm about her new comedy, "Georgia Rule." (CBSNews.com)



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=V4v7SWY3MCc http://img.youtube.com/vi/V4v7SWY3MCc/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/Qdys4mKFNuw/WACO-The-Rules-of-Engagement-extra-infrared-footage.html WACO: The Rules of Engagement (extra: infrared footage) DVD Bonus Feature: Infrared FootagePART 1 - http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4298137966377572665PART 2 - ... all » http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1755692679103175934911 calls - http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8808439217729437398The first full-length documentary film to present the complete picture of the series of events outside Waco, Texas during 1993 that resulted in the shooting of 4 federal agents and the deaths of 86 men, women, and children of the Branch Davidian religious sect.A highly detailed examination of the interaction between David Koresh, his members, and Federal Law Enforcement. It shows how the FBI misled the public and American political leaders in order to focus overwhelming force on a group whose diversity of race, national origin, and apocalyptic religious beliefs made its members easy targets for lethal abuse of civil and human rights. Gripping and deeply thought provoking, the film provides America with something it truly needs - an opportunity to review the historical record of events at Waco. The findings raise doubts about the FBI's version of the story and their larger role in similar instances of law enforcement.http://www.waco93.com/[alex jones new world order police state martial law oklahoma city david koresh]



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=Qdys4mKFNuw http://img.youtube.com/vi/Qdys4mKFNuw/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/55lOhYw8Lxk/Congressman-Brad-Sherman-Martial-Law-if-We-Voted-No-2.html Congressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [2] October 2, 2008, U.S. House of Representatives. Congressman Brad Sherman [D-CA] asks: "But why are we bailing out the Bank of China? Why are we bailing out the Saudi royal family?... The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and by sustaining a panic atmosphere... A few Members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted ``no.''________________________________________Congressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu5ICongressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55lOhYw8LxkCongressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHFUa4SpPBUSherman's speech on the 1st proposal (or 2nd if you count the proposal published on Sept 20th) of the Bailout bill (September 29th 2008): Best on Bailout Dayhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXGv6qSwuPsAlex Jones interviews Brad Shermanhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egXhZMaY26wSherman's Blue Paper on the Bailouthttp://bradsherman.house.gov/081001comprehensive_article.pdf171 Heroes vs 263 Traitorshttp://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-681Paul Craig Roberts: It takes the trouble off the banks and puts it on the taxpayershttp://youtube.com/watch?v=PLbWau3rsag&NR=1________________________________________CONFUSION WITH CONGRESSIONAL MARTIAL LAWHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared -congressional martial law- on Sept 27, 2008. Which is a procedural blanket that removes the rule requiring at least one day between the time a Bill is introduced in the House and the day a vote is taken.Listen to congressman Michael Burgess [R-TX] addressing congressional martial law on Sept 28: "I understand we're under martial law as declared by the Speaker last night."http://youtube.com/watch?v=l7B4laX1E70Read the BLANKET MARTIAL LAW RULE THROUGH MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 29THhttp://rules-republicans.house.gov/ShortTopics/Read.aspx?id=220That IS NOT the Martial Law that Brad sherman was referring to.Brad Sherman was specifically referring to Martial Law IN AMERICA, IN THE NEAR FUTURE, not the Sept 27-29 procedural blanket.Sherman would later confirm the nature of the threat (a National Emergency) on the Alex Jones show.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egXhZMaY26w________________________________________TRANSCRIPTThat's what I call fear mongering--unjustified, proven wrong.We've got a week; we've got 2 weeks to write a good bill. The only way to pass a bad bill: Keep the panic pressure on.Now, what has the Senate done to this bill? First, they've added pork to it in the hope that that would buy off some votes. Second, they've created a double hostage situation. Now, we already know that the first bill was a hostage situation. When Paulson announced this crisis, he basically sent a ransom note, and that ransom note read, ``We've got your 401(k), and you'll never see it alive again unless you send us $700 billion in unmarked bills.'' So we had one hostage situation.There's the AMT patch, a necessary tax provision that Congress passes every year. Without this patch, the AMT tax, which is designed to fall only on the wealthy, will hit another 20 million American households. Everyone knows we have to pass this. We sent it to the Senate for them to pass. Instead of passing it, they created a hostage situation. They refused to pass it. They put it on this bill. So now we're being told, if you don't send $700 billion to Wall Street, we're going to tax 20 million American families in a way no one in Congress wants to do. That's totally phony. If we vote down this bill, the Senate will pass the AMT patch bill that we sent them just like they do every year. There has been some attempt to tell the American people that this bill isn't going to cost anything permanently because, in 2013, we're going to get the money back from the financial services industry. Nothing could be further from the truth. All the bill says is that the President has to send us a proposal to tax the financial services industry. Now, keep in mind, if the President has any good ideas in 2013, he'll send them to us or she'll send them to us. If the President is only sending us revenue ideas because they have to send them and they don't want to send that proposal, well then, they're going to send it with a note, saying, ``I'm required to give you this proposal, but I think it's a bad idea.'' What do you think we're going to do with a Presidential proposal that is disparaged by the President?(...)[ http://www.c-spanarchives.org/congress/?q=node/77531&id=8902076 ]



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=55lOhYw8Lxk http://img.youtube.com/vi/55lOhYw8Lxk/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/m-prj24Qp_k/Marjorie-Cohn-Guantanamo-Bay-and-Interrogation-Rules.html Marjorie Cohn: Guantanamo Bay and Interrogation Rules Marjorie Cohn unequivocally call for investigation of war crimes. She is a law professor from Thomas Jefferson School of Law and is President of the National Lawyers Guild. She explains the violation of supreme US law by the Bush Administration before the House Judiciary Constitution, Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Subcmte. PDF of testimony http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/Cohn080506.pdf



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=m-prj24Qp_k http://img.youtube.com/vi/m-prj24Qp_k/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/jO9WXEqz03o/Dodd-Speech-on-the-Constitution-Rule-of-Law.html Dodd Speech on the Constitution & Rule of Law Chris Dodd speaks on the floor of the Senate about FISA, the rule of law, and defending the Constitution from retroactive immunity.http://chrisdodd.com/constitution



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=jO9WXEqz03o http://img.youtube.com/vi/jO9WXEqz03o/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/noOWCvAVrY4/Namewee-s-Apology-Rejected-Follow-Rule-of-Law.html Namewee's Apology Rejected - Follow Rule of Law The Cabinet has not accepted Wee Meng Chee's apology to the government and the people for mocking the national anthem as it does not have the authority to do so, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Abdul Aziz said. He said the Cabinet had referred the matter to the Attorney-General since the offence was not committed against the Cabinet but against the nation."However, Wee's apology may be useful in getting him a lighter sentence (if he is found guilty of the offence)," he told reporters after opening a two-day Media and Information Warfare International Conference. Nazri said: "We must allow the Attorney-General to investigate and decide whether to take this person (Wee) to court". Stressing that the case was not a racial issue but a "national interest issue", he said anyone who commits an offence against the nation, irrespective of race, would have to face the music. He said the video clip insulted the national anthem, and the action could be tolerated in Western countries but not in Malaysia. "In this country we have laws (against mocking the national anthem), we cannot create a precedent whereby after you've committed an offence, you apologise and you get away with it," he said. He said "Negarakuku", the title of the video clip, also insinuated that the nation was "gila" (crazy), as "Kuku" also means cuckoo.Update: Aug 21 2007More details & interview with Wee athttp://www.jeffooi.com/2007/08/more_meng_chee_now_investigate.php



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=noOWCvAVrY4 http://img.youtube.com/vi/noOWCvAVrY4/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/N-6jf2Llx5s/Best-of-8-Simple-Rules-Ep-1-5.html Best of 8 Simple Rules Ep. 1-5 8 Simple Rules Season 1From Episode 1-5



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=N-6jf2Llx5s http://img.youtube.com/vi/N-6jf2Llx5s/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/U42a45F-vuE/NBC-Makes-Mockery-of-US-Constitution-Rule-of-Law.html NBC Makes Mockery of US Constitution & Rule of Law http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2008/03/fallons-resignation-is-frightening.htmlFallon's resignation is frightening. see link for message to Jim Miklaszewski, NBC News Chief Pentagon Correspondent - about Post at NBC News BLOG "Field Notes" on Tuesday, March 11, 2008 11:25 AMhttp://representativepress.blogspot.com/2008/03/dear-mr-miklaszewski.htmlhttp://representativepress.googlepages.com/



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=U42a45F-vuE http://img.youtube.com/vi/U42a45F-vuE/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/LPH5ikNKaVE/Alex-Jones-Freeman-Strawman-The-Rule-of-Law-Part-1-7.html Alex Jones Freeman\Strawman & The Rule of Law Part 1/7 WARNING!!! Sound Level May Be High.



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=LPH5ikNKaVE http://img.youtube.com/vi/LPH5ikNKaVE/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/qBPTsEhU8qU/Ja-Rule-Murder-Inc-Law-School.html Ja Rule Murder Inc. Law School Murder Inc. Law. A Sketch by all the King's Men, from their October show 2006. Find out more at www.murderinclaw.edu. Filmed by NUGGET.



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=qBPTsEhU8qU http://img.youtube.com/vi/qBPTsEhU8qU/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/nemjTSMKIHk/Ma-Ying-jeou-s-double-standards.html Ma Ying-jeou's double standards * In his own wordsOn the Wednesday, February 14, 2007 broadcast of Talking Show (大話新聞), host Cheng Hung-yi (鄭弘儀) presented several clips of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) which provide an interesting contrast between his attitude when talking about his political opponents and when the shoe is on the other foot.The first set of clips shows Ma speaking just prior to the indictment against Taiwan President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) wife Wu Shu-jen (吳淑珍) and shortly afterwards. These clips are then juxtaposed with the words and actions of both Ma and his supporters just one day after Ma himself was indicted.* Under Ma's thumbIn the first part, Chairman Mao-without-the-o says that President Chen would "die a horrible death" if he didn't step down on his own. http://tinyurl.com/2ghbsu (What did Ma do? First of all, he waited to be indicted -- but that's not all. Just 2 hours later, he declared his candidacy for the 2008 presidential election. http://tinyurl.com/yp6vmj )Referring to the ongoing cases surrounding Chen, Ma says (taking on the president's voice and ironically pointing at himself), "If my associates are corrupt, I need to take all of the responsibility. I can't blame anyone else, because I am the emperor." Ma says, "With problems like this affecting Chen's family, how can he talk to me about 'the law'?"* Rules are for other peopleIn the second segment -- with images from one day after Ma himself was indicted -- members of his party cheer, "Ma Ying-jeou, jiayou! (an expression of encouragement)" and "KMT, victory!" despite their party rules saying that an indicted member can't run for office. Well, if that was true to begin with, it's not anymore. They changed their rules in a move of desperation just hours after Ma was indicted. (Even though President Chen's wife hasn't yet been convicted, the DPP suspended her membership after the indictment, following their own rules the way they should.)Next, KMT member Li Keng Kuei-Fang (厲耿桂芳) -- who is currently on the Taipei City Council -- screeches (and I'm talking "fingernails-across-the- blackboard" here) that Ma is "like Jesus being nailed to the cross" and that Ma is "the greatest person in history." (Yes, she actually said those things!) They've mobilized a nationwide signature drive to get people to "swear" support for Ma. Check out the gangster-looking guys with the black gloves accusing the other side of having "black hands" controlling the judiciary. (Hogwash!) Be sure to notice how "enthusiastically" these guys throw down those black gloves.* What went around came back aroundRemember all that redshirt garbage about "not distinguishing between blue (Ma's side) and green (Chen's side)" (不分藍綠)? http://tinyurl.com/258b59 Remember this picture? http://tinyurl.com/2bejag Which direction are those thumbs facing now? Up their you-know-whats!Can you spot the double standards of Ma and his supporters? I knew that you could.



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=nemjTSMKIHk http://img.youtube.com/vi/nemjTSMKIHk/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/_7FPH5ioUKI/POLICE-CONSPIRACY-TO-DEPRIVE-CIVIL-RIGHTS-UNDER-COLOR-OF-LAW.html POLICE CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW Prosecutors must disclose obviously exculpatory evidence even absent a request from the defendant, and when Guyot interfered with a court order in an attempt to prevent the court ordered penal liability exam from potentially exonerating Pinkerton, and to suppress the question of Pinkertons liability from a court ordered mental examination is equivalent to the suppression of evidence, along with suppressing exculpatory evidence found on Pinkertons website, are grounds that disqualify him for immunity. See Brady v. Maryland373 U.S. at 87Prosecutor Guyot and members of the County of Kauai Prosecutors Office have a professional responsibility to divulge the evidence favorable to the Plaintiff, when they learned from Pinkerton's website and failed to allow that information to negate Pinkerton's guilt, regardless if the evidence implicated several Kauai Police Officers.Once again, no sanctions were ever brought against the Prosecutors Office or Guyot for with violating Rule 3.8(b) of the Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct.Rule 3.8. of the Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct: Performing the duty of the public prosecutor or other government lawyer. A public prosecutor or other government lawyer shall:(a) not institute or cause to be instituted criminal charges when [the prosecutor or government lawyer] knows or it is obvious that the charges are not supported by probable cause; andb) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by a protective order of the tribunal. [emphasis added]" [Pages 9,10,11 of http://www.kpinkerton.com/08-00222/11... ] Kauai Police Officer Gilbert V. Asuncion of Koloa, my neighbor of three blocks away, has repeatedly filed false charges that neither he nor other corrupt officers can prove.I recorded the mediation in which Officer Asuncion's' verbal statement discredits his first two investigations and most importantly his Temporary Restraining Order against me.The prosecution has reviewed this audio file and upon request of Kauai prosecutor Marc E. Guyot, Judge Trudy Senda issued my a Supreme Court Rule 5.1When Officer Gilbert Asuncion enlisted the help of Sgt. Richard Rosa, Sgt Nelson Agni, Officer Okamoto and Officer Gabriel to cover up the crimes and police misconduct on behalf of Officer Gilbert V. Asuncion at a SCHOOL FUNCTION on SCHOOL PROPERTY, this act became "CONSPIRACY TO INTERFERE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS" and "CONSPIRACY TO DEPRIVE CIVIL RIGHTS".Officer Gilbert V. Asuncion, 5/10/1970. I wish this video to help him to see that he is not above the LAW and he will be held responsible for his crimes. Sgt Richard Rosa: You are a liar as my phone records show. See you in court.Police Officers Okamoto and Gabriel: You are not at liberty to conspire against me either. You are not permitted to threaten to shoot ANYBODYS dogs, let alone mine. Unless you have a warrant or in "HOT PURSUIT", you cannot threaten to breach someone's property in order to unlawfully arrest someone at 02:30 am in order to shelter a fellow officer from liability for the crimes he committed against me while at a school function.I ask this question for the Prosecution: Why offer me a Global Plea Offer and then indict me because I refuse to sign and relinquish all my Constitutional Rights. Will these abuses of power never end? Why should I submit to your tyranny when all the proof I have shows the KPD officers implicated in my cases are the real criminals? It is for that reason alone that I created the video Stand My Ground can be found at this link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QO2-AVpJVrI The evidence collection posted at http://www.kpinkerton.com reaches beyond the 12 jurors sitting on my case.In closing I must give all glory to JAH! Let God's true name be sanctified. Without Jehovah's guidance this would not be possible.



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=_7FPH5ioUKI http://img.youtube.com/vi/_7FPH5ioUKI/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/SHFUa4SpPBU/Congressman-Brad-Sherman-Martial-Law-if-We-Voted-No-3.html Congressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [3] October 2, 2008, U.S. House of Representatives. Congressman Brad Sherman [D-CA] asks: "But why are we bailing out the Bank of China? Why are we bailing out the Saudi royal family?... The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and by sustaining a panic atmosphere... A few Members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted ``no.''________________________________________Congressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu5ICongressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55lOhYw8LxkCongressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [3]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHFUa4SpPBUSherman's speech on the 1st proposal (or 2nd if you count the proposal published on Sept 20th) of the Bailout bill (September 29th 2008): Best on Bailout Dayhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXGv6qSwuPsAlex Jones interviews Brad Shermanhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egXhZMaY26wSherman's Blue Paper on the Bailouthttp://bradsherman.house.gov/081001comprehensive_article.pdf171 Heroes vs 263 Traitorshttp://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-681Paul Craig Roberts: It takes the trouble off the banks and puts it on the taxpayershttp://youtube.com/watch?v=PLbWau3rsag&NR=1________________________________________CONFUSION WITH CONGRESSIONAL MARTIAL LAWHouse Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared -congressional martial law- on Sept 27, 2008. Which is a procedural blanket that removes the rule requiring at least one day between the time a Bill is introduced in the House and the day a vote is taken.Listen to congressman Michael Burgess [R-TX] addressing congressional martial law on Sept 28: "I understand we're under martial law as declared by the Speaker last night."http://youtube.com/watch?v=l7B4laX1E70Read the BLANKET MARTIAL LAW RULE THROUGH MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 29THhttp://rules-republicans.house.gov/ShortTopics/Read.aspx?id=220That IS NOT the Martial Law that Brad sherman was referring to.Brad Sherman was specifically referring to Martial Law IN AMERICA, IN THE NEAR FUTURE, not the Sept 27-29 procedural blanket.Sherman would later confirm the nature of the threat (a National Emergency) on the Alex Jones show.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egXhZMaY26w________________________________________TRANSCRIPTWe are told in 2009 we are going to pass really good legislation to make sure that this never happens again--corporate governance reform, regulatory reform, we are going to get it done. What is really going to happen? We may write a really good bill in the House, something Wall Street really hates. Then it goes over to the Senate where 41 Senators out of 100 is all it takes to block it. I don't think they will defeat reform legislation in the Senate. They will delay it and then they will dilute it. And by the time it passes, it will be so diluted, Wall Street will drink it down with a smile on its face knowing that no effective reform is really being imposed upon them. So we are not going to see meaningful regulatory reform; although we will pass something and Wall Street will tell you it is a big deal. We will see million-dollar-a-month salaries, or one-and-a-half million or $2 million a month salaries paid to the executives of these firms while they are getting a bailout with our taxpayer money. We are going to see a very large percentage of this money going to buy securities, bad paper, and toxic assets currently in safes in Shanghai, Beijing, London and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We will see all of the power in the hands of the Bush administration and in the hands of a part-time temporary administrator, namely the Secretary of the Treasury. Under this bill, if it passes, we don't really know what is going to happen to the economy. No one knows. The only thing that is certain, two things: Wall Street executives are going to get huge amounts of money and our children and grandchildren are going to get stuck with hundreds of billions of dollars of additional Federal debt. And we as a country, having just done a bad $700 billion program, will not be able to do anything to help homeowners because we won't have the money. We won't be able to bail out local governments because we won't have the money. We won't be able to deal effectively with the real banking-lending crisis because we will have shot our entire wad on a bill that is guaranteed only to do one thing, and that is to help the truly wealthy on Wall Street. My time has expired, and I look forward to the Speaker giving unanimous consent to the gentlelady from Ohio controlling the next hour.[ http://www.c-spanarchives.org/congress/?q=node/77531&id=8902076 ]



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=SHFUa4SpPBU http://img.youtube.com/vi/SHFUa4SpPBU/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/d655ycX3f7g/Alex-Jones-Freeman-Strawman-The-Rule-of-Law-Part-2-7.html Alex Jones Freeman\Strawman & The Rule of Law Part 2/7 ,,,



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=d655ycX3f7g http://img.youtube.com/vi/d655ycX3f7g/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/-063clxiB8I/Code-of-Conduct.html Code of Conduct Rule #0: Rules #1 and #2 of the internet still apply. Your memes are not, at this juncture, something that the real world can appreciate. Although meme speak between fellow Anonymous is acceptable, focus on the target and keep it to a minimum.Rule #1: Stay cool.Rule #2: Stay cool, especially when harassed. You are an ambassador of Anonymous. Although individuals trying to disrupt your demonstration will get on your nerves, you must not lose your temper. Doing so will harm the protest and tarnish the reputation of Anonymous.Rule #3: Comply with the orders of law enforcement officers above all else. Doing otherwise is harmful to the demonstration as a whole and may compromise your performance as a human being. Do not request badge numbers unless you are being treated in a very abusive manner, as doing so will anger officers.Rule #4: Notify city officials. Most jurisdictions either have rules about public protests, or would prefer to be notified that they are taking place. Know the rules for your jurisdiction and abide by them.Rule #5: Always be across the street from the object being protested.Rule #6: In the absence of a road, find another natural barrier between yourself and the target of protest. Doing so will make it more difficult for individuals hostile to your cause to come and harass you.Rule #7: Stay on public property. You may be charged for trespassing if you do not.Rule #8: No violence.Rule #9: No weapons. The demonstration is a peaceful event. Your weapons. You will not need them.Rule #10: No alcohol or pre-drinking. Violating this rule may easily precipitate a violation of rules 1 and 2.Rule #11: No graffiti, destruction, or vandalism.Rule #12: If you want to do something stupid, pick another day. These should be self explanatory. Violation of these rules during a demonstration will tarnish the reputation of Anonymous, harm the demonstration itself and leave you vulnerable to attention from law enforcement.Rule #13: Anonymous is legion. Never be alone. Isolation during a protest marks you as a target for handlers who wish to provoke an angry reaction from you and other hostiles. In keeping with this principle...Rule #14: Organize in squads of 10 to 15 people.Rule #15: One or two megaphones per squad. A megaphone is helpful for maintaining the overall cohesion of a demonstration and spreading your message. However, too many will confuse the public and render you hearing impaired.Rule #16: Know the dress code. Forming a loose yet reasonable dress code for protest members will help to maintain cohesion and get the public to take you seriously.Rule #17: Cover your face. This will prevent your identification from videos taken by hostiles, other protesters or security. Use scarves, hats and sunglasses. Masks are not necessary, and donning them in the context of a public demonstration is forbidden in some jurisdictions.Rule #18: Bring water. A dehydrated, thirsty Anonymous is not a useful Anonymous.Rule #19: Wear good shoes. Following these rules will assure your comfort during the demonstration. Keep in mind that demonstrations may often be quite lengthy.Rule #20: Signs, fliers, and phrases. Have yours ready. Make sure that signs are large enough to read. Also ensure that the text on your signs and your phrases are pertinent to the target of the protest.Rule #21: Prepare legible, uncomplicated and accurate flyers to hand out to those who wish to know more regarding the motivations behind your actions.Rule #22: Document the demonstration. Videos and pictures of the event may be used to corroborate your side of the story if law enforcement get involved. Furthermore, posting images and videos of your heroic actions all over the internet is bound to generate win, exhorting other Anonymous to follow your glorious example.------------



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=-063clxiB8I http://img.youtube.com/vi/-063clxiB8I/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/ya86zLFxHrs/Musharraf-defends-emergency-rule-03-Nov-07.html Musharraf defends emergency rule - 03 Nov 07 In a pre-recorded, televised address Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan's president, defended his decision to declare emergency rule. Towards the end of his speech, Musharraf appealed to his international audience in English.



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=ya86zLFxHrs http://img.youtube.com/vi/ya86zLFxHrs/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/e75PP4AaDf4/Alex-Jones-Freeman-Strawman-The-Rule-of-Law-Part-4-7.html Alex Jones Freeman\Strawman & The Rule of Law Part 4/7 ,,,



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=e75PP4AaDf4 http://img.youtube.com/vi/e75PP4AaDf4/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/zFYVcZod1MY/Harper-No-constitution-No-Charter-of-Rights-No-rule-of-law.html Harper=No constitution,No Charter of Rights. No rule of law. http://canadawatch.orgYour City Online Poll - Canadianhttp://www.freewebs.com/habeascorpuscanada/grounds.html -Center Page on the Right Side-http://www.citytv.com/edmonton/yourcity.aspxjoin Congressman Wexler's call for Bush/Cheney Impeachment Hearingshttp://wexlerwantshearings.com/http://www.impeachbush.org/ http://www.youtube.com/CongressmanWexlerhttp://www.youtube.com/wexlerforcongress (more)Support Canada Petitionshttp://canadapetitions.chipin.com/canadapetitionsStart demanding Prime Minister Stephen Harper ask the Canadian people if they want a Security & Prosperity Partnership(SPP)with the U.S. & Mexico."We'd Rather Be Canadian"Patriots Please take the time to heckle our Prime Minister to come clean to all CanadiansHarper.S@parl.gc.caIts your future.if you don't take action, who will?http://www.mawovancouver.org/Bring our kids home,send our politicians Instead!http://www.spp.gov/http://www.canadianactionparty.ca/http://whitenoise.webnode.com/A DECISION ABOUT THE RESTRUCTURING OF CANADA INTO AN INTEGRATED NORTH AMERICAN UNION WITH A COMMON CURRENCY IS A DECISION FOR THE CITIZENS OF CANADA.http://www.forthecause.us/000ftc-newstopic-nafta-corridor.shtml"Stephen Harper lives in a legal Disney World. In that Disney World, there's no constitution, no Charter of Rights. No rule of law." — Irwin Cotler, the Liberal justice minister, reacts to the Conservative leader's comments about some Canadian judges being "social activists."Canadians who seek to save their country, must therefore seek to cancel NAFTA, as the legal basis for the greed-driven and fear associated pursuit of the destruction of Canada, under the pretext of the "War of Terrorism".A Case for Repealing NAFTA and Blocking the NAU.Canada-( http://youtube.com/watch?v=O7ZDNHf30pI )America-( http://youtube.com/watch?v=_qfmLbn-Kh0 )Mexico-( http://youtube.com/watch?v=QOztn8tHTdc )All Reject NAFTAhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNLnBnTuxvUANTIWAR AND SOCIAL JUSTICEhttp://www.pacificfreepress.com/content/view/1965/1/http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=414820f7-998a-496f-b41d-c033e5d6d168OTTAWA -- The Canadian Forces are using a controversial private security firm to train some of its troops sent to Afghanistan.Select Canadian soldiers have been sent to Blackwater U.S.A. in North Carolina for specialized training in bodyguard and shooting skills. Other soldiers have taken counterterrorism evasive-driving courses with the private military company now at the centre of an investigation into the killings of Iraqi civilians and mounting concerns about the aggressive tactics of its workers in the field.Critics of Blackwater label the firm as a mercenary organization and question why a professional military such as the Canadian Forces can't do its own training in specialized areas.The Ottawa-based counterterrorism unit, Joint Task Force 2, has also maintained ongoing training links to the company.Military officials did not have further details on why Blackwater would be hired, but promised to provide those. Later, however, they did not comment on the matter.Canadian Forces spokesman Lt.-Col. Jamie Robertson said the military does not discuss its special forces training. But he noted that Blackwater and other firms have been contracted to provide services for other units."The Canadian Forces has occasionally contracted companies to provide specialized training to our personnel in those cases when specialized training is not available within the Canadian Forces due to a range of factors, including the unavailability of training resources, expertise or specialized facilities and equipment," said Robertson.Still, Dawn Black, the NDP's defence critic, questioned the need for Blackwater to be involved in training Canadian troops."My understanding is we have some of the best-trained forces in the world, and great trainers, so why do we need our armed forces personnel to be trained by a mercenary organization?"A total dollar figure on what has been spent on Blackwater training was not available by press time, since training is contracted out individually on a unit-by-unit basis, said Robertson.But he provided an example of one such contract: 18 members of the Strategic Advisory Team sent to Kabul went to Blackwater in June for a two-day course called hostile-environment defensive driver training. The cost was $29,000 which included accommodation and meals, as well as extra course time for two of the team members.Minister of Public Safety Stockwell Day, when asked whether the training in Blackwater is appropriate, defended the Forces.BILL MOYERS: Congress has begun a new round of hearings to get answers to questions the Bush administration refused to answer last year — questions about accountability.http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/02012008/watch2.html



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=zFYVcZod1MY http://img.youtube.com/vi/zFYVcZod1MY/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/stYme1l7lX0/8-Simple-Rules-1x05-Part-1-3.html 8 Simple Rules - 1x05 - Part 1/3 Show: 8 Simple RulesSeason: 1Episode: 5 - Son-in-Law*NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTS INTENDED*



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=stYme1l7lX0 http://img.youtube.com/vi/stYme1l7lX0/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/kPAGNNsrwUw/Philippe-Sands-Guantanamo-Bay-and-Interrogation-Rules.html Philippe Sands: Guantanamo Bay and Interrogation Rules Philippe Sands without reservation states that war crimes were committed by the most senior members of the Bush administration. He is a professor of law at the University College London and recently wrote a book "Torture Team". He speaks before the House Judiciary Constitution, Civil Rights & Civil Liberties Subcmte. PDF of testimony http://judiciary.house.gov/media/pdfs/Sands080506.pdfAttachment(Vanity Fair article)http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/guantanamo200805



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=kPAGNNsrwUw http://img.youtube.com/vi/kPAGNNsrwUw/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/AtPwePj-8kY/A-message-to-Obama-and-the-liberals-respect-firearms-rights-and-the-rule-of-law.html A message to Obama and the liberals... respect firearms rights, and the rule of law. It's time to fight! Fight for the second amendment!A few requests from some of us who didn't vote for Obama.1. Respect firearms rights!2. Respect the rule of law!FREE U.S. Border Patrol Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean!



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=AtPwePj-8kY http://img.youtube.com/vi/AtPwePj-8kY/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/iEKIkcHOV78/South-Sudan-Rule-of-law.html South Sudan - Rule of law After over 22 years of Civil war, South Sudan has started rebuilding. The United Nations Development Programme is helping to build democratic institutions and in promoting the Rule of law in this war torn land



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=iEKIkcHOV78 http://img.youtube.com/vi/iEKIkcHOV78/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/LEU43u-lNLU/Wake-Up-Pat-Robertson-s-Regent-Law-School-and-G-W-Bush.html Wake Up! Pat Robertson's Regent Law School and G.W.Bush I tried to make this as pleasent as possible- but it just sucks. Music is "Little Wing" by Jimi Hendrix covered in this video by Stevie Ray Vaughan.



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=LEU43u-lNLU http://img.youtube.com/vi/LEU43u-lNLU/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/Dk33dPlbO8Q/8-Simple-Rules-1x05-Part-2-3.html 8 Simple Rules - 1x05 - Part 2/3 Show: 8 Simple RulesSeason: 1Episode: 5 - Son-in-Law*NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTS INTENDED*



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=Dk33dPlbO8Q http://img.youtube.com/vi/Dk33dPlbO8Q/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/SaHDApMqYEc/8-Simple-Rules-1x05-Part-3-3.html 8 Simple Rules - 1x05 - Part 3/3 Show: 8 Simple RulesSeason: 1Episode: 5 - Son-in-Law*NO COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENTS INTENDED*



]]> http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/stream.php?id=SaHDApMqYEc http://img.youtube.com/vi/SaHDApMqYEc/0.jpg http://www.bestbollyvideos.com/video/hfhO38CPlAI/Government-Officials-Voting-Fraudulently-Lawmakers-Breaking-the-Law-Texas-Legislature.html Government Officials Voting Fraudulently: Lawmakers Breaking the Law - Texas Legislature What would happen to you if police caught you on video fraudulently voting? Would cops quickly arrest you and throw you in jail, only to have the District Attorney immediately charge you with fraud?What would happen to elected government officials if they were caught doing the same? Absolutely nothing?In fact, our representatives in the U.S. government have become so brazen, that they commit fraud in plain view, on a daily basis, while at the same time trying to pass laws that would further restrict and criminalize the public for doing the same.This is a clear sign of excessive government, when the government is so large and overwhelmingly powerful that it's agents can abuse the civilian population without any sense of guilt, remorse, or fear - when government officials deny charges of illegal conduct made against themselves as a matter of semantics, and when agents of the government expect and get immunity from any of their actions; actions that would be criminally prosecuted upon any other citizens.The few standing up for freedom, liberty, and the Constitution, such as Congressman Ron Paul, who has been called the Thomas Jefferson of our day, are the only hope for America; the only hope for returning our empire-sized government to it's proper Constitutional levels of national defense, upholding the law, and protecting the rights of the people and individual liberties.There's been a lot of debate at the State Capitol on bills relating to voter integrity. Some lawmakers are pushing for measures such as requiring voters to show a photo identification before being allowed to cast a ballot. Another bill would criminalize anyone who delivers a ballot for someone unable to drive to the polls. With so much emphasis on one vote for one person, you'd think lawmakers would make sure they follow the rules, too. In this CBS 42 Investigates, Nanci Wilson found many don't. State Representative Debbie Riddle, R-Tomball, authored the bill that would require vote